Stick a fork in it, looks like this one’s pretty much done.

Following the SFWA presidential bulletin that the petition that caused a tempest in the SFnal teapot was over a thing that isn’t even going to actually happen, I saw three links of interest on the matter that basically appear to be wrapping it up.

Jim Hines has a nice thoughtful post up trying to understand what motivated a lot of people to sign the thing in the first place. It’s worth looking at, just on that basis alone.

John Scalzi has cogent commentary on things to keep in mind regarding petitions and free speech. He also points out that he personally knows a LOT of the signers on the petition and wasn’t going to cotton to picking on them. Fair enough.

And Victoria Strauss points out that SFWA is a force for good in a lot of ways–pointing out quite correctly that Writer Beware itself is a critical resource for all writers, not just the ones writing SF/F. She’s optimistic that these upheavals the organization is going through are a sign of it improving.

I’d like to hope she’s right, if nothing else because it just saddens me to think of an organization dedicated to the betterment of the careers of writers of SF/F–the genre that should be looking forward, not back–can get embroiled in crap like this over and over. I mean, I still don’t qualify to join so it’s not like I have any real horse in this race, but still. I’d like to see them move on from this to the betterment of everyone in the organization, and everyone who might like to join it in the future.

We’ll see what happens next and how the rest of the year proceeds for all involved.

ETA: Dara’s wrap-up post on the matter is over here.


Posted

in

by

Comments

4 responses to “Last round of SFWA commentary–this time”

  1. […] when readers thought the dust had settled on last week’s debate about “political correctness” in sci-fi publishing, a group of highly […]

  2. […] when readers thought the dust had settled on last week’s debate about “political correctness” in sci-fi publishing, a group of highly […]

  3. […] Daily Dot Coverage Mary Robinette Kowal Responds N. K. Jemisin Responds Too Scalzi on 1st Amendment Rights & Petitions Nude or Semi-Nude Men Are Not Common On the Covers Of Romance Novels Writer Beware Chimes In Teleread Opines More Scalzi On First Amendment Hines On PetitionGate Kerfuffle Over? […]